Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Karan Singh vs Raghav Jaisinghani Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Singh vs Jaisinghani analysis and find out who is favored!
Karan Singh vs Raghav Jaisinghani Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Singh 0 - 0 Jaisinghani
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Singh has won 49.33% of points on their second serve, while Jaisinghani has won 45.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Singh, in recent form, has won 49.81% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jaisinghani has won 47.65%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.49% and 31.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Singh has saved 61.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jaisinghani has saved 43.66% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Singh has won 52.83% of matches played (W/L 28/ 25), with Jaisinghani winning 48.84% (W/L 21/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Singh has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 19/ 13), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 64/ 60). Jaisinghani has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 39/ 39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 27% (W/L 3/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Singh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 26/ 22), where as Jaisinghani has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.84% of matches (W/L 21/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Singh has played against opponents with an average rank of 126.79 while Jaisinghani has played against players with an average rank of 71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Singh has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jaisinghani has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Singh has converted 43.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jaisinghani has converted 35.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
633
Rank
625
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
53% (83-73)
Career Total W/L
47% (42-47)
57% (17-13)
YTD W/L
47% (7-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Karan Singh vs Raghav Jaisinghani For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Singh VS Jaisinghani
Sportsbook
Offer
Singh VS Jaisinghani H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Karan Singh | Raghav Jaisinghani |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (17/13) | 47% (7/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (38/30) | 46% (16/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (345/305) | 49% (170/180) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 50% (6/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 139 | 14 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 85 | 34 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:55 | 1:19:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 195.73 | 71 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1254/2146) | 68% (437/641) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (884/1254) | 62% (271/437) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (440/892) | 45% (92/204) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (91/207) | 35% (24/68) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (816/2047) | 38% (276/724) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (17/10) | 47% (7/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (17/29) | 43% (6/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (17/14) | 57% (7/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (17/2) | 43% (7/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 38% (8/3) |
Karan Singh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Kabir Hans
Player
Karan Singh
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
19 of
24)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karan Singh
Player
Nitin Kumar Sinha
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
7
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Karan Singh
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
33 of
39)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
66
|
5-7 7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karan Singh
Player
Corban Crowther
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
104)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
51 of
71)
62%
(
28 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karan Singh
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Karan Singh
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karan Singh
Player
Pedro Araujo
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karan Singh
Player
Kacper Szymkowiak
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
51
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karan Singh
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Campana
Player
Karan Singh
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Raghav Jaisinghani Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Siddharth Vishwakarma
Player
Raghav Jaisinghani
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raghav Jaisinghani
Player
Pablo Trochu
83%
(
72 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
109)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
11
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
53 of
70)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
25 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
36 of
109)
98
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Valle
Player
Raghav Jaisinghani
45%
(
44 of
97)
1st Serve %
74%
(
70 of
95)
6
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
53 of
70)
64%
(
34 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
27 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
28 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nam Hoang Ly
Player
Raghav Jaisinghani
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 2-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Chirag Duhan
Player
Raghav Jaisinghani
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yash Chaurasia
Player
Raghav Jaisinghani
74%
(
63 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
53%
(
45 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 7-6(6) 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Shivank Bhatnagar
Player
Raghav Jaisinghani
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
79%
(
46 of
58)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
74
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Singh Vs Jaisinghani Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Singh are available here and Jaisinghani photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
